false
OasisLMS
Catalog
Multiprofessional Critical Care Review: Adult 2024 ...
Ethics and Palliative Considerations in Critical C ...
Ethics and Palliative Considerations in Critical Care
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
The transcript outlines various ethical dilemmas and principles in critical care, focusing primarily on clinical ethics consultations and the doctrine of double effect. The discussion opens with a real-world scenario involving an 82-year-old COVID-19 patient whose deteriorating condition leads to a complex decision-making process between aggressive treatment and concerns of ethically prolonging suffering. Another case involves an 86-year-old woman with metastatic cancer, highlighting conflicts between patient wishes for peaceful death and family demands for all possible interventions.<br /><br />Key points include understanding the indications, expected outcomes, and terms used in clinical ethics consultations, such as the ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and autonomy. The doctrine of double effect is emphasized, which allows for pain relief even if it unintentionally hastens death, as long as the primary intention is to alleviate suffering.<br /><br />The speaker stresses the importance of shared decision-making, addressing concepts like informed non-dissent and resolving value-laden conflicts without offering futile treatments. Legal and ethical guidelines support the withholding or withdrawal of life support when medically appropriate while ensuring decisions align with the patient's and family's values. The transcript concludes with discussion on managing moral distress and compassion fatigue among caregivers, especially in the context of COVID-19.
Keywords
ethical dilemmas
clinical ethics consultations
doctrine of double effect
shared decision-making
beneficence
non-maleficence
moral distress
×
Please select your language
1
English