false
Catalog
Reviewer Academy
Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
The video discusses the peer review process in academic journals. The goals of peer review include determining the scientific validity, originality, and appropriateness of a manuscript. Peer review also helps to ensure journal alignment with submitted content, improve clarity and quality, and identify any errors. The editorial team consists of the administrative team, responsible for managing journal requirements and supporting users, and the scientific team, led by the editor-in-chief who oversees the peer review process. Manuscripts go through a process of checks and are reviewed by at least two experts in the field before a final decision is made. There are threats to high-quality peer review, such as predatory journals and lack of transparency. Confidentiality in peer review varies among journals, with options like single-blinding, double-blinding, or completely open peer review. It is important for potential reviewers to know the journal's confidentiality policy. Overall, high-quality peer review focuses on the novelty, accuracy, and importance of a manuscript.
Keywords
peer review process
scientific validity
journal alignment
confidentiality
predatory journals
Society of Critical Care Medicine
500 Midway Drive
Mount Prospect,
IL 60056 USA
Phone: +1 847 827-6888
Fax: +1 847 439-7226
Email:
support@sccm.org
Contact Us
About SCCM
Newsroom
Advertising & Sponsorship
DONATE
MySCCM
LearnICU
Patients & Families
Surviving Sepsis Campaign
Critical Care Societies Collaborative
GET OUR NEWSLETTER
© Society of Critical Care Medicine. All rights reserved. |
Privacy Statement
|
Terms & Conditions
The Society of Critical Care Medicine, SCCM, and Critical Care Congress are registered trademarks of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
×
Please select your language
1
English