63-D-Dimer and Fibrinogen Magnitude and Hypercoagulability by Thromboelastography in Severe COVID-19
Back to course
Asset Caption
The Society of Critical Care Medicine's Critical Care Congress features internationally renowned faculty and content sessions highlighting the most up-to-date, evidence-based developments in critical care medicine. This is a presentation from the 2021 Critical Care Congress held virtually from January 31-February 12, 2021.
Abhimanyu Chandel, MD
Introduction/Hypothesis: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a high rate of thrombotic complications related to an acute inflammatory state. D-dimer has been established as a marker of disease severity in COVID-19. Despite a paucity of data, D-dimer concentration has been used by institutions to identify candidates for intensified anticoagulant treatment for prevention and mitigation of the thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19. Thromboelastography (TEG) maximum amplitude (MA) has been validated as a marker of hypercoagulability with previous research defining hypercoagulability by a TEG MA ≥ 68 mm. We examined the relationship between common clinical laboratory parameters and hypercoagulability as represented by TEG MA.
Methods: We performed a single center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who received ECMO for the treatment of COVID-19 with simultaneous TEG, coagulation, and inflammatory markers (D-dimer, fibrinogen, ferritin, and C-reactive protein) drawn during hospitalization. TEG MA values and inflammatory markers were compared in patients with and without a thrombotic complication during admission. Correlation tests were performed to identify the coagulation and inflammatory markers that may predict hypercoagulability as defined by elevated TEG MA.
Results: 168 TEGs were available in 24 patients. C-reactive protein and fibrinogen were significantly higher in patients that developed a thrombotic event versus those that did not (p=0.038 and p=0.043 respectively). There was no difference in D-dimer between groups (p=0.312). D-dimer was negatively correlated with TEG MA (p<0.001) and explained little of the variance in this variable (adjusted R2=0.162). Fibrinogen was significantly positively correlated (p<0.001) with MA and explained over 50% of the variance. A fibrinogen > 441 mg/dL had high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity of 91.2%, specificity of 85.7%) for the detection of MA ≥ 68 mm.
Conclusions: In critically ill patients with COVID-19, D-dimer had an inverse relationship with hypercoagulability as measured by TEG MA. D-dimer elevation may reflect severity of COVID-19 related sepsis rather than designate patients likely to benefit from anticoagulation. Fibrinogen concentration may represent a more useful marker of hypercoagulability in this population.