false
OasisLMS
Catalog
SCCM Resource Library
Con: Clinicians Should Not Use Social Media Platfo ...
Con: Clinicians Should Not Use Social Media Platforms to Promote Public Health Advocacy
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
The transcript discusses the potential downsides and challenges of using social media for advocacy, particularly for clinicians. Although social media can rapidly disseminate information and foster connections, it also poses risks such as misinformation, professional conflicts, and personal exposure to public scrutiny. The speaker, involved in various professional social media accounts, emphasizes the importance of understanding institutional policies regarding social media use and the potential professional consequences of advocacy. They highlight the distinction between misinformation and disinformation, with the latter being deliberately harmful. Examples of public backlash against healthcare advocacy illustrate the complexities and potential repercussions when personal and organizational stances diverge. The speaker advises on navigating social media carefully, protecting personal privacy, and ensuring advocacy efforts with evidence-based support. Despite negativity, social media's power for fostering relationships and advancing healthcare advocacy shouldn't be underestimated, provided one remains vigilant and strategic in its use.
Asset Caption
One-Hour Concurrent Session | Pro/Con Debate: Should Critical Care Clinicians Use Social Media for Advocacy in Public Health?
Meta Tag
Content Type
Presentation
Membership Level
Professional
Membership Level
Select
Year
2024
Keywords
social media advocacy
misinformation
professional conflicts
healthcare advocacy
institutional policies
public scrutiny
×
Please select your language
1
English